Difference between revisions of "The Crying of Lot 49 Obs"
(New page: Novel vs. Story. This seems to be the place to note something Pynchon has written--in Slow Learner, the introduction---about this work. He wrote there, in talking about his early stories t...) |
Gelitripping (Talk | contribs) (removed obs on magic & puns, moved to page by page annotations) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Novel vs. Story | + | ==Novel vs. Story== |
| − | has written | + | |
| + | This seems to be the place to note something Pynchon | ||
| + | has written — in ''Slow Learner'', the introduction — about this work. | ||
He wrote there, in talking about his early stories that his next story | He wrote there, in talking about his early stories that his next story | ||
| − | The Crying of Lot 49 was marketed as a novel....<br> | + | ''The Crying of Lot 49'' was marketed as a novel....<br> |
Given Pynchon's care with concepts, this distinction seems worth | Given Pynchon's care with concepts, this distinction seems worth | ||
| − | keeping in mind. Stories meant, usually, to be taken in | + | keeping in mind. Stories meant, usually, to be taken in "all at once", |
in one reading, novels not. Stories much more focussed on a single theme usually; novels full of many themes. | in one reading, novels not. Stories much more focussed on a single theme usually; novels full of many themes. | ||
| − | Pynchon's words have made me think about his lifelong theme of crossing boundaries, of seeing boundaries as artificial, man-made | + | Pynchon's words have made me think about his lifelong theme of crossing boundaries, of seeing boundaries as artificial, man-made — [http://masondixon.pynchonwiki.com/wiki/ ''Mason & Dixon''], |
| − | most thoroughly | + | most thoroughly. Boundaries such as those between story and novel. |
| − | As a "story" to get a kind of unitary impression, is how I have seen Harold Bloom's remark on reading The Crying of Lot 49. Read it again immediately, he avers. | + | As a "story" to get a kind of unitary impression, is how I have seen Harold Bloom's remark on reading ''The Crying of Lot 49''. Read it again immediately, he avers. Its meaning(s) are very mysterious, we might all agree.\ |
Latest revision as of 14:24, 10 December 2007
Novel vs. Story
This seems to be the place to note something Pynchon
has written — in Slow Learner, the introduction — about this work.
He wrote there, in talking about his early stories that his next story
The Crying of Lot 49 was marketed as a novel....
Given Pynchon's care with concepts, this distinction seems worth keeping in mind. Stories meant, usually, to be taken in "all at once", in one reading, novels not. Stories much more focussed on a single theme usually; novels full of many themes.
Pynchon's words have made me think about his lifelong theme of crossing boundaries, of seeing boundaries as artificial, man-made — Mason & Dixon, most thoroughly. Boundaries such as those between story and novel.
As a "story" to get a kind of unitary impression, is how I have seen Harold Bloom's remark on reading The Crying of Lot 49. Read it again immediately, he avers. Its meaning(s) are very mysterious, we might all agree.\
