Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Crying of Lot 49"
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''"paranoia"'''<br> | '''"paranoia"'''<br> | ||
| − | A key element in the | + | A key element in the understanding of ''The Crying of Lot 49'' was pervasively 'in the air' in the 60s when CoL49 was written (according to TRP in ''Slow Learner'') |
| − | Major historian Richard Hofstadter's defining, influential essay,'The Paranoid Style in American Politics' was published in Harper's Magazine in November 1964. | + | Major historian Richard Hofstadter's defining, influential essay,'The Paranoid Style in American Politics' was published in Harper's Magazine in November 1964. [[http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/conspiracy_theory/the_paranoid_mentality/the_paranoid_style.html]] |
| + | |||
| + | I think that a discussion of both [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mircea_Eliade Mircea Eliade]'s ''The Sacred and the Profane'' and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Otto Rudolf Otto]'s ''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Idea_of_the_Holy The Idea of the Holy]'' should be included as a separate page rather than an entry into one of the chapters. | ||
Latest revision as of 02:02, 17 July 2024
“In America there are no boundaries, only mazes. No one knows how to draw them, though they are indeed drawn, whether randomly or conspiratorially into binary systems of mutual exclusion or permissive inclusion that deflates all differences and distinction. Here no one seems sure of the border between fact and fiction, animate and inanimate, the projected and the perceived.”
-Peter Euben on Thomas Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49 (in The Tragedy of Political Theory: The Road Not Taken, Princeton University Press, 1990)
"paranoia"
A key element in the understanding of The Crying of Lot 49 was pervasively 'in the air' in the 60s when CoL49 was written (according to TRP in Slow Learner)
Major historian Richard Hofstadter's defining, influential essay,'The Paranoid Style in American Politics' was published in Harper's Magazine in November 1964. [[1]]
I think that a discussion of both Mircea Eliade's The Sacred and the Profane and Rudolf Otto's The Idea of the Holy should be included as a separate page rather than an entry into one of the chapters.
