Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Crying of Lot 49"
(New page: Friday, July 13th, 2007 in Literature “In America there are no boundaries, only mazes. No one knows how to draw them, though they are indeed drawn, whether randomly or conspiratorially...) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
“In America there are no boundaries, only mazes. No one knows how to draw them, though they are indeed drawn, whether randomly or conspiratorially into binary systems of mutual exclusion or permissive inclusion that deflates all differences and distinction. Here no one seems sure of the border between fact and fiction, animate and inanimate, the projected and the perceived.” | “In America there are no boundaries, only mazes. No one knows how to draw them, though they are indeed drawn, whether randomly or conspiratorially into binary systems of mutual exclusion or permissive inclusion that deflates all differences and distinction. Here no one seems sure of the border between fact and fiction, animate and inanimate, the projected and the perceived.” | ||
| − | -Peter Euben on Thomas Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49 | + | -Peter Euben on Thomas Pynchon’s ''The Crying of Lot 49'' (in ''The Tragedy of Political Theory: The Road Not Taken'', Princeton University Press, 1990) |
Revision as of 05:28, 14 July 2007
“In America there are no boundaries, only mazes. No one knows how to draw them, though they are indeed drawn, whether randomly or conspiratorially into binary systems of mutual exclusion or permissive inclusion that deflates all differences and distinction. Here no one seems sure of the border between fact and fiction, animate and inanimate, the projected and the perceived.”
-Peter Euben on Thomas Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49 (in The Tragedy of Political Theory: The Road Not Taken, Princeton University Press, 1990)
